Pages

Tuesday, 17 April 2018

Term 12018 Reflection

Term 1 

1. Using a Checklist 
This year I have adjusted my checklist process. When students have completed work they add it to a checklist- I comment on it and color the cell so students know what to do next. Green means it is ready to blog. Orange means there is a comment and feedforward, yellow means I can access it. This is making students more accountable. I found this easier than using teacher dashboard because I can see all the students and their work due this week at a glance. 

Next steps: Monitoring my select student's next term who are not getting work done. Giving them two options for the day. Do this then you can do this. Check in with them after every block. 













2. Science
The science learning this year has been fantastic. I have completed about 10 science-based lessons from Susan's bank of lessons. My students are now starting to use their science books in the sessions and their 'me' pages are becoming more developed with their ideas and thinking opposed to pictures or nothing at the start. 
Next steps- Use the question cards during EVERY lesson. Focus on 1-2 a lesson as we work our way through Students will become familiar with critical thinking and the sentence starters help them form sentences.


3. Digital Modelling Books
This term I used a digital modeling book and had documents where students worked collaboratively on. This was extremly effective- The students loved it and they used other students work to support/ help their learning and understanding. I noticed that It worked best in small groups 6-8. I also need to make sure I change the editing rights after the lesson so students can go back and deleted others work. This term I really want to try and use them more. I managed to use it once a week BUT this isn't reflective of how often I taught writing- I need to update the modeling book after every session and ensure students are using it.
Next step: teach students where it is- Constantly refer to it. Get students to look at it when they are stuck.



M.I.T Moonshot

This week I have been thinking about my moonshot inquiry. During my last KPMG session, I changed my focus from STEM to Reading. This was because my student's achievement was low in ALL academic areas- My group and I discussed that If they could read at a higher level this would benefit other curriculum areas. 

My new inquiry is 'How can I increase critical thinking in Reading?' 

The tool I want to look into creating would be a framework or a rubric that would help my year 5-6 students think critically about what they are reading. 

What I want to look into to help me with this? 
- Blooms taxonomy 
- Comprehension strategies (Effective literacy practices) 
- Sheena Cameron strategies and framework. 

Connecting my Inquiry to the design thinking process 
After looking at Rebecca Jenson's Manaiakalani Inquiry slide I can see that I am planning, trying and innovating. The design thinking framework is helping me create prototypes to support my problem. 




I am in the process of organizing an observation of another Year 5-6 class at a Manaiakalani School. This will help me think about the level of year 5-6 and compare it to what my students are doing.- this will furthermore support my inquiry. 

Monday, 16 April 2018

Class On Air Term 1 Reflection

This term I have been working with Manaiakalani and Google taking part in Manaiakalani google class on air. The experience has been allowed me to reflect on my practice and notice what I am actually doing when I am teaching. I think how we think a lesson goes to how it actually goes watching it back differs. I learned that at times I miss key teaching moments as I am distracted by other students - Working in smaller groups helps minimize this as it is hard to know what 28 students are all thinking and what they are gaining from the lesson. My lessons have had a science/ technology type focus. Science is one of my weaker curriculum areas as I don't have much experience teaching it. This term we have been given P.D by Susan heeps, this has helped me immensely. Next term I am going to focus on Literacy and reading. My inquiry this year is how can I increase critical thinking in Reading- so the knowledge and skills that I develop in my inquiry can add to my class on air episodes. 

So what next term?

- Camera angles (Light reflection- blackout class windows to ensure that the quality of the footage is easy to see) 
- Sound- Use the plugin mic and my phone ( ensure the phone is facing the speaker) 
- Create: What are students going to create next term to demonstrate their understanding and learning?
- Will observe at another school. See what other year 5-6 students are doing. 
- How are we using the digital tools to enhance our learning ( Modelling book, working collaboratively on docs) 
-  Look at Bloom's taxonomy, Reading comprehensions.
- Smaller groups (Science was a whole class and was great when starting out my science journey but now I need to target specific needs). 
- Key learning and teaching focus- develop critical thinking.
- Making cross the curriculum connections. 


Tuesday, 10 April 2018

Science PD

Susan discussed the importance of planned talk. It needs to be specific to be effective. 
Need the talk to drive the learning as you don't want the kids to just be doing an activity (which is what I think is happening in my class currently). 

Points for Reading as a Staff: 
Accountable talk - Question Cards- (Getting more Student to Student talk) 

Managing Talk through grouping- Mixed ability grouping is the most effective, can group students through interests of languages. (Some need for ability grouping) 

Managing Time- Show them a clock, how did we tell time in the past?

Cultural Diversity and managing Linguistics-  Adaptability of learners (Example; text messages being restrictive originally- students created a 'txt' language to fit more characters into their text messages) 

Setting Clear Expectations- Self-check/ 

Managing to speak, listening, writing, reading- Oral language is KEY to critical thinking. Explicitly showing them 'how' to talk. 

Knowing your learners- How important this is.


Science Task:

Susan taught us how to get our students to think critically and ask more questions during science sessions. We looked at discussion questions. We each choose two and then completed the learning task with that question in mind. This was helpful as it focused our thinking and we could think deeper about our question.

Next steps:
I'm going to print out question cards and use them in my next science lesson. 



Tuesday, 27 March 2018

MIT at KPMG Session One


After looking at my MIT moonshot and questioning my thinking I have decided to change my inquiry.
Working with Justine (a Corporate Citizen at KPMG) and thinking what is my actual problem?
I discovered that my actual problem is low student achievement- I then thought what is going to
be the best solution to my problem. After thinking about all the possible solutions we arrived at
the conclusion that focusing on CRITICAL THINKING within reading (I decided to choose reading
instead of the STEM as my students have two curriculum levels to 'catch up' too. We talked about
reading underpinning most curriculum areas at level 3 as students need to be able to access other
parts of the curriculum through reading. This seemed the most logical place to start if I focus on
critical thinking in reading it will 'spill' into my other curriculum areas too.

Problem: Students are not working at Level 3 of the New Zealand Curriculum
Possible Solution/ Focus: Students need to be able to think critically, a framework will help them do this
and will give them a consistent structure to respond to texts in a critical manner.
Possible Tool: Critical thinking framework for READING. Including all the comprehension strategies that
will allow students to think critically about the text. Students will use the framework to self-assess AND
peer assess.

What will help me develop my tool? Bloom's taxonomy, NZC, Literacy learning progressions, Duffy sheet,
Sheena cameron reading comprehension strategies.

Digital Technologies that will help me?
Site page with links to each comprehension strategy. How to? With a lesson example or teacher model? Videos?

Glossary:
Framework- a basic structure underlying a system, concept, or text.
Critical Thinking- the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment.
Problem Solving- the process of finding solutions to difficult or complex issues.

Straight out of the curriculum
"During these two years, students continue to develop their accuracy and fluency as readers of a variety of texts.
They increase their level of control and independence in selecting strategies for using texts to support their
learning. By the end of year 6, students are required to read longer texts more quickly and to select appropriate
strategies for different reading purposes more effectively than students in year 5.

When students at this level read, respond to, and think critically about texts, they will :
-Understand how they select from and use their repertoire of comprehension strategies, which include: making
connections between their prior knowledge and the concrete examples in a text in order to understand abstract
ideas in the text.
-Locating and summarising ideas (e.g., by skimming or scanning, by identifying key words, topic sentences,
and key questions, or by using subheadings).
- Drawing on several related items of information in order to infer ideas and information that are not directly
stated in the text.
-Evaluating and integrating ideas and information across a small range of texts;

Friday, 23 March 2018

M.I.T Inquiry Term 1

After our M.I.T Hui, I re-looked at my student data and gathered more information. The new data that I gathered was interesting and has made me rethink my inquiry focus. My focus was originally on engagement and critical thinking. My student voice data showed that my students are engaged in the learning and motivated. This has been a shift from the end of last year. So in the first 7 weeks this term I have already engaged this group of learners (Which is sometimes half the challenge). So I can now focus on the critical thinking and problem-solving. Possible next focus steps: 

- Universal design for learning 
- Blooms taxonomy 
- Learner-based discussions with a focus on deeper level questioning. 
-Rewindable learning
-Reflection on practice
-My knowledge of STEM needs to be upskilled.
-How I can integrate STEM throughout the day?

-Rich tasks- STEM- prompts problem-solving


The STEM element of my inquiry has had a strong science focus this term. Students are enjoying the science experiences and have started asking questionings on their own. The next step will be thinking deeply about these questions and then find the answers. I want the students to drive their own learning and inquiries so they can become lifelong learners. 




Below is data gathered in Week 5-6 of Term 1 2018 


PAT Maths 2017
PAT reading Comp
Asttle Writing
R
8 / 41 Staine 2
10 / 35 Staine 3
1A
T
11 / 41Staine 3
11 / 35 Staine 3
1A
E
12 / 41 / Staine 3
12 / 35 Staine 3
2B



Manaiakalani- Google Classon Air - Reflection



Over the last two weeks, I have filmed two lessons for Manaiakalani- Google Classon Air. The experience has been challenging and enjoyable. It is still a challenge to get the footage and the sound during the lesson and to capture those 'ahh huh' moments. It is a great learning experience to watch back the footage and episodes for myself from a teacher perspective- I often think- I should've asked it differently, I should've made a connection there etc. We also watch back the videos as a class and look at ways we can improve. My inquiry goal is looking at critical thinking and problem solving and how to enhance this through questioning. 

So what? 
After reading 'Content-Area Conversations: How to Plan Discussion-Based Lessons for Diverse Language Learners by Douglas Fisher, Nancy Frey, and Carol Rothenberg. I have gathered some next steps that will help me promote more discussion based lessons. The key things that I noticed missing from my science lesson is that the discussions and questions are surface level discussions, and although I have improved with my questioning around noticing I still want to get my students thinking at a deeper level and I am wanting my students to be able to compare and contrast ideas, ask questions, and describe phenomena in science. (This will then benefit other curriculum areas). 

The reading highlighted the need for different types of talk and discussion and how to prompt students to do so. Below is a language learning poster. I am going to use this to base my questioning and the language I want to students to use. I will put it up in the class and refer to it often when modeling my own language in science. 


Figure 5.1. Language of Learning Poster

Language objective
What is it?
What does it sound like?
To instruct
Giving directions
"The first step is …"
"Next …"
"The last part is …"
To inquire
Asking questions
Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?
"What do you think?"
To test
Deciding if something makes sense
"I still have a question about …"
"What I learned is …"
To describe
Telling about something
Use descriptive words and details
To compare and contrast
Showing how two things are alike and different
"Here is something they both have in common …"
"These are different from each other because …"
To explain
Giving examples
"This is an example of …"
"This is important because …"
To analyze
Discussing the parts of a bigger idea
"The parts of this include …"
"We can make a diagram of this."
To hypothesize
Making a prediction based on what is known
"I can predict that …"
"I believe that _________ will happen because …"
"What might happen if …?"
To deduce
Drawing a conclusion or arriving at an answer
"The answer is because …"
To evaluate
Judging something
"I agree with this because …"
"I disagree because …"
"I recommend that …"
"A better solution would be …"
"The factors that are most important are …"